Prepositional Logic: Semantics and Syntax
Artificial languages: used for logic because natural languages are not precise enough and have double meanings.
Formal language: represents similarities among arguments of a natural language, such as sentential logic, or propositional logic. A more sophisticated language is predicate logic.
Sentence letters: represents complete preposition in natural languages.
Parenthesis: ( )
~P & Q --> R is read as ((~P & Q) --> R)
P --> Q <--> R is read as ((P --> Q) <--> R)
P v Q & R is not allowed, as it is ambiguous between (P v (Q & R)) and ((P v Q) & R)
P --> Q --> R is not allowed, as it is ambiguous between (P --> (Q --> R)) and ((P --> Q) --> R)
- Parenthesis may be dropped for convenience so long as there is no ambiguity resulted
- Strongest bond to Weakest bond: ~, & and v, -->, <-->
~P & Q --> R is read as ((~P & Q) --> R)
P --> Q <--> R is read as ((P --> Q) <--> R)
P v Q & R is not allowed, as it is ambiguous between (P v (Q & R)) and ((P v Q) & R)
P --> Q --> R is not allowed, as it is ambiguous between (P --> (Q --> R)) and ((P --> Q) --> R)
Connectives:
- Ampersand & both are true
- Wedge v or
- Arrow --> if Φ, then Ψ
- Double arrow <--> if and only if
- Tilde ~ not
- Atomic sentence: a sentence letter standing alone is a WFF. Ex. A, B, D12
- Negation: If Φ is a WFF, then ~Φ is a WFF. This rule is recursive.
- Binary connectives:&, v, -->, <--> Unary connective: ~
If Φ(Phi) and Ψ(Psi) are WFFs, then...
Conjunction (Φ & Ψ) Φ and Ψ are conjuncts
ex. Φ & Ψ
Φ and Ψ
Both Φ and Ψ
Φ, although Ψ
Though Φ, Ψ
Disjunction (Φ v Ψ) Φ and Ψ are disjuncts
Φ and Ψ
Both Φ and Ψ
Φ, although Ψ
Though Φ, Ψ
Disjunction (Φ v Ψ) Φ and Ψ are disjuncts
ex. Φ v Ψ
Φ or Ψ
Either Φ or Ψ
Φ unless Ψ (~Φ --> Ψ)
Conditional (Φ --> Ψ) Φ is antecedent. Ψ is the consequent
Φ or Ψ
Either Φ or Ψ
Φ unless Ψ (~Φ --> Ψ)
Conditional (Φ --> Ψ) Φ is antecedent. Ψ is the consequent
ex. Φ --> Ψ
If Φ, Ψ
Φ, only if Ψ
Φ provided that Ψ
Φ on the condition that Ψ
Φ is a necessary for Ψ
Whenever Φ, Ψ
Given that Φ, Ψ
In case Φ, Ψ
Biconditional (Φ <--> Ψ)
If Φ, Ψ
Φ, only if Ψ
Φ provided that Ψ
Φ on the condition that Ψ
Φ is a necessary for Ψ
Whenever Φ, Ψ
Given that Φ, Ψ
In case Φ, Ψ
Biconditional (Φ <--> Ψ)
ex. Φ <--> Ψ
Φ if and only if Ψ
Φ is equivalent to Ψ
Φ is necessary and sufficient for Ψ
Φ just in case Ψ
Φ if and only if Ψ
Φ is equivalent to Ψ
Φ is necessary and sufficient for Ψ
Φ just in case Ψ
Comments
Post a Comment